Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	112GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 112GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 185 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Memory 73 1-Core 81.5 2-Core 162 61% 106 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 632 56% 477 Pts	64-Core 2,478 153% 2,478 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 240 2,991 User benchmarks, average bench 4% XFX(1682 7240) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.9.2 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	5.15% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 6.85 Parallax 7.19 5% 6.68 fps	MRender 6.9 Gravity 6 Splatting 7.57 6% 6.82 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.15% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HS-SSD-C2000 1TB 168 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 917GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM12.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1035 934 908 917 941 941 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	165% Outstanding	Read 1,057 Write 1,031 Mixed 951 SusWrite 946 224% 996 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 62.4 4K Mixed 38.4 128% 43.7 MB/s	DQ Read 614 DQ Write 524 DQ Mixed 600 441% 580 MB/s
Poor: 155% ↑ This bench: 165% Great: 282%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TYA4U2666D19321C TYA4U2666D19321C TYA4U2666D19321C 111GB 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz 32767, 32767, 16384, 32767 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 4.5 14% 4.97 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 6.2 19% 6.77 GB/s	Latency 94.7 42% 94.7 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

SSD
SNV2S1000G 1TBKingstonBench 260%, 75,739 samples	45x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	45x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	37x

RAM
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	229x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	133x
Atermiter 2x16GBUnknownBench 65%, 839 samples	88x

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $130

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16