Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell Precision Tower 5810
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds)
Memory	24 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200110
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Oct 27 '20 at 20:43
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	90%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 10,197 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 98.4 2-Core 174 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 323 41% 312 Pts	64-Core 419 26% 419 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820 7,330 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Lighting 25 Reflection 26.7 Parallax 38.1 20% 29.9 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 29.2 Splatting 27 25% 31.6 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SK hynix SH920 2.5 7MM 512GB 1,396 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 241GB free (System drive) Firmware: CL00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 297 290 276 267 284 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55.1% Above average	Read 228 Write 216 Mixed 190 SusWrite 284 52% 229 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 12 50% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 342 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 238 196% 282 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 92%
Samsung XP941 PCIe M.2 512GB 1,482 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 477GB free Firmware: UXM62H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 558 562 532 515 460 503 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Read 388 Write 372 Mixed 259 SusWrite 522 87% 385 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 53.7 4K Mixed 18.4 67% 27.3 MB/s	DQ Read 442 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 260 223% 331 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 166%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 6.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 231 232 226 224 228 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GB 1,319 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	MC Read 29.5 MC Write 42.3 MC Mixed 33.7 100% 35.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 20.6 52% 18.1 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 121%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	414x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	385x
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples	286x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	108x
SM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 1,320 samples	105x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	62x

RAM
HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GBHynixBench 90%, 1,961 samples	347x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	208x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 4x8GBMicronBench 93%, 857 samples	193x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16