Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 560-$65 10,722 User benchmarks, average bench 41% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	40.5% Average	Memory 61.4 1-Core 59.7 2-Core 96.5 45% 72.5 Pts	4-Core 120 8-Core 94.7 15% 108 Pts	64-Core 132 8% 132 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M 7,697 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C06A) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	2.63% Terrible	Lighting 2.83 Reflection 4.85 Parallax 1.22 2% 2.97 fps	MRender 6.14 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 3.74 3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.63% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung HM320II 320GB 2,350 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2AC101C4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 34 24 12 23 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Read 36.2 Write 51 Mixed 40.9 SusWrite 26.9 29% 38.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 105% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F 2x2GB 1,093 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.9% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 9.2 22% 7.7 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 5.1 12% 4.37 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 330MNvidiaBench 2%, 7,697 samples	30x
GeForce 310MNvidiaBench 1%, 8,303 samples	4x

RAM
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	10x
M471B5273BH1-CF8 1x4GBSamsungBench 19%, 145 samples	2x
EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F 2x2GBElpidaBench 26%, 802 samples	2x

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $170

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16