HP EliteBook 2560p

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP EliteBook 2560p (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 162B
Memory	6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20161007
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 27 '20 at 15:25
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	99%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2540M-$315 16,964 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	60.1% Good	Memory 85.9 1-Core 82.7 2-Core 151 64% 107 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 197 27% 199 Pts	64-Core 199 12% 199 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 162B) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	2.2% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 3.62 Parallax 1.59 2% 2.55 fps	MRender 3.24 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 4.52 3% 3.02 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.2% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149 13,029 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC10365 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 122 125 116 122 103 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 235 Write 143 Mixed 143 SusWrite 121 36% 161 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 27.2 4K Mixed 14.1 54% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 66.6 DQ Mixed 64 57% 88.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 51%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21 168,449 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 313GB free Firmware: 0001SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 94 96 92 97 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	54% Above average	Read 93.6 Write 92.9 Mixed 52.4 SusWrite 94.8 61% 83.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 88% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	48.6% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.9 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 14.3 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 2560p Builds (Compare 367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 2560p

CPU
Core i5-2520MIntel $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples	118x
Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples	97x
Core i5-2540MIntel $315Bench 52%, 16,964 samples	92x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	340x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	21x
HD Graphics 4000IntelBench 2%, 106 samples	3x

SSD
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	10x
C400 RealSSD 128GBMicronBench 56%, 11,312 samples	9x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	125x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	72x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	47x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $183

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16