Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics75.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '20 at 03:26
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 109
2-Core 216
75% 134 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 671
67% 544 Pts
64-Core 864
54% 864 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
Zotac(19DA 3543) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Lighting 99.9
Reflection 89.4
Parallax 79.1
81% 89.5 fps
MRender 72.3
Gravity 81.8
Splatting 77.1
63% 77.1 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 97 57 27 47 13 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 512
Write 447
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 102
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 20.7
83% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 49
103% 205 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
558GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 187 188 188 188 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 178
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 187
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 107%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST31000322CS 1TB-$250
896GB free
Firmware: CA13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 99 100 99 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 109
Write 110
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 98.6
69% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
52.9% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.7
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,380 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $476
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback