| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 75.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | PC Amd Am4 Gen3 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK TUF X470-PLUS GAMING |
| Memory | 8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190902 |
| Uptime | 3.8 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 27 '20 at 01:47 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
89.7%
Excellent
|
94% 172 Pts
|
83% 674 Pts
|
62% 1,002 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
75.6%
Very good
|
85% 99.9 fps
|
58% 81.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
512gb PCS 2.5" SSD 512GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 76 7.7 16 15 32 MB/s
|
37.1%
Below average
|
72% 325 MB/s
|
42% 12.7 MB/s
|
16% 42.5 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 214 209 205 209 213 MB/s
|
102%
Outstanding
|
108% 147 MB/s
|
257% 1.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CM4X8GD3600C18K2D 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
|
92.3%
Outstanding
|
95% 33.2 GB/s
|
81% 28.4 GB/s
|
54% 74.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Amd Am4 Gen3 Builds (Compare 593 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: PC Amd Am4 Gen3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $85Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 99x |
| Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples | 91x |
| Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $156Bench 96%, 383,420 samples | 63x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 64x |
| RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 62x |
| RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 54x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $409 |