| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Csl-computer A0000001 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK TUF B450-PLUS GAMING |
| Memory | 26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191015 |
| Uptime | 2.2 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 26 '20 at 21:48 |
| Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.5%
Good
|
66% 116 Pts
|
51% 418 Pts
|
33% 527 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3620 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
120%
Outstanding
|
101% 194 fps
|
171% 218 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 139 116 69 64 47 MB/s
|
38%
Below average
|
62% 278 MB/s
|
20% 7.87 MB/s
|
134% 162 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 123 122 127 125 127 MB/s
|
77.7%
Very good
|
96% 131 MB/s
|
203% 1.53 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 120 120 120 120 MB/s
|
70%
Very good
|
82% 112 MB/s
|
188% 1.43 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
75.4%
Very good
|
76% 26.7 GB/s
|
72% 25.3 GB/s
|
42% 96.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A0000001 Builds (Compare 1,720 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Csl-computer A0000001
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 237x |
| Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 159x |
| Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 153x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 373x |
| RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 96x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 76x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 104% - Outstanding | Total price: $648 |