PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | HP 550-059na (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 2B2C |
Memory | 11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20150401 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 26 '20 at 15:59 |
Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 12% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
72.4%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
HP(103C 8465) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate ST3500514NS 500GB-$19
299GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 84 89 92 91 MB/s
|
47.5%
Average
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
26GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.6 6 7.2 8.2 7.4 MB/s
|
5.23%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5471-055.A00LF 9905471-064.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
54.4%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 705NvidiaBench 2%, 4,665 samples | 2x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 2x |
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $214 |