Asus P7P55D-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P7P55D-E  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '20 at 11:31
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 97
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 141
66% 106 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 248
34% 251 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 11.8
10% 12.4 fps
MRender 39.1
Gravity 30
Splatting 22.3
24% 30.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 62 49 19 22 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.4% Below average
Read 127
Write 120
Mixed 125
SusWrite 44.1
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 14.3
93% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 97.7
DQ Write 70.7
DQ Mixed 70.1
56% 79.5 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 108%
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
358GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 60 62 61 62 75 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.1% Above average
Read 192
Write 120
Mixed 143
SusWrite 62.7
29% 129 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 40.6
128% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 83
DQ Mixed 87.5
67% 90.4 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 119%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
686GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 63 63 62 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 60.8
Write 98.8
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 62.4
52% 71 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
194% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 76%
Samsung S2 Portable 320GB
173GB free, PID 1f03
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 22
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 26
34% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
46% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 11.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 50.3
80% 50.3 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D-E Builds (Compare 779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $159
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback