| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK FX505GT |
| Memory | 25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200922 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 25 '20 at 23:48 |
| Run Duration | 117 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
|
36%
Below average
|
30% 42.4 Pts
|
13% 104 Pts
|
8% 126 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1AB1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5671
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
35.5%
Below average
|
34% 51.2 fps
|
39% 47.3 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
227GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 91 59 58 60 58 MB/s
|
104%
Outstanding
|
144% 647 MB/s
|
148% 50.1 MB/s
|
179% 256 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2666 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
49.5%
Average
|
55% 19.3 GB/s
|
23% 8 GB/s
|
30% 134 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT Builds (Compare 2,140 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9300HIntelBench 68%, 23,588 samples | 991x |
| Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples | 796x |
| Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples | 353x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples | 1,087x |
| GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples | 1,053x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |