Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '20 at 21:57
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 76.2
2-Core 139
62% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 483
48% 382 Pts
64-Core 486
33% 486 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$188
CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Lighting 70.3
Reflection 66.1
Parallax 82.8
58% 73.1 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 69.6
Splatting 55.7
40% 64.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 57%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$53
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 271 304 294 251 279 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 410
Write 386
Mixed 388
SusWrite 285
83% 367 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 37.6
122% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 14
DQ Mixed 39
52% 101 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 130%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$130
213GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 82 85 85 84 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 87.8
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 84.1
59% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 62%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB
145GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 84 88 87 87 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 76
Write 84.1
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 86.9
48% 67 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.7% Average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 16.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 13.9
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $206

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $743
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $153Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback