Medion Akoya P5363 I/C267

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Medion Akoya P5363 I/C267 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION H110H4-EM
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160727
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '20 at 20:19
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6402P 15,913 User benchmarks, average bench 68% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Memory 85.5 1-Core 107 2-Core 210 77% 134 Pts	4-Core 411 8-Core 408 55% 409 Pts	64-Core 402 25% 402 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Nvidia(10DE 2187) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20 Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.8% Above average	Lighting 66.9 Reflection 64.8 Parallax 53 54% 61.6 fps	MRender 66.9 Gravity 72.3 Splatting 56 52% 65.1 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB 6,038 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT2101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 44 46 45 44 45 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	47.1% Average	Read 451 Write 56.3 Mixed 155 SusWrite 46.9 38% 177 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 21.9 4K Mixed 16.1 74% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 18.5 DQ Mixed 38.3 42% 75 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 59%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 753GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 119 120 119 117 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Read 115 Write 115 Mixed 78.3 SusWrite 118 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 84%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23 12,481 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 29GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 42 31 30 32 29 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Read 132 Write 95.4 Mixed 101 SusWrite 40.9 117% 92.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 2.8 196% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GB 6,175 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	42.2% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 12.7 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 13.5 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Akoya P5363 I/C267 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Medion Akoya P5363 I/C267

CPU
Core i5-6402PIntelBench 68%, 15,913 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	4x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	1x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,038 samples	3x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	2x

RAM
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 6,175 samples	3x
M378A5143EB1-CPB 2x4GBSamsungBench 68%, 4,308 samples	2x
M378A1G43EB1-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 3,609 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $92

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16