Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics76.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '20 at 17:09
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 135
2-Core 269
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 868
85% 696 Pts
64-Core 1,118
69% 1,118 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
Asus(1043 86BD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Lighting 102
Reflection 91.5
Parallax 80
83% 91.2 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 82.3
Splatting 78.3
64% 77.2 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 834 599 600 599 594 585 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 2,002
Write 1,713
Mixed 837
SusWrite 635
288% 1,297 MB/s
4K Read 55.5
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 71
257% 93.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,288
DQ Write 895
DQ Mixed 952
748% 1,045 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 246%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
238GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 484 483 489 488 488 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 482
Mixed 398
SusWrite 484
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 61.6
204% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 359
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 129%
Great: 134%
Kingston SHSS37A480G 480GB
235GB free
Firmware: SAFM02.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 488 488 489 489 489 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 468
Mixed 345
SusWrite 488
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 38.6
143% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 176
174% 277 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
125GB free
Firmware: 0C3G37R5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 129 41 121 135 63 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 488
Write 398
Mixed 214
SusWrite 135
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 41
150% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 157
150% 239 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 168 166 169 170 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 141
Mixed 82.9
SusWrite 167
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 24.1
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 38.3
SC Mixed 27.1
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $709
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback