Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

4 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3430 4,096 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	66.9% Good	Memory 92.5 1-Core 60.6 2-Core 121 58% 91.5 Pts	4-Core 242 8-Core 241 32% 241 Pts	64-Core 240 15% 240 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 68%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 301GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61K1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 70 55 70 79 31 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.2% Below average	Read 236 Write 100 Mixed 150 SusWrite 73.9 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 18.8 4K Mixed 18.9 69% 20.2 MB/s	DQ Read 29.3 DQ Write 18.8 DQ Mixed 21.2 17% 23.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 102%
ADATA HD830 2TB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1TB free, PID a84a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 26.4 Write 27.1 Mixed 25.5 SusWrite 26.9 36% 26.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 68% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 1332 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	40.7% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 12.9 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 11 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 63.2 63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	10x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	10x
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	7x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	9x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16