HP p6623w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p6623w  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AB1
Memory16.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100907
Uptime10.4 Days
Run DateOct 25 '20 at 15:17
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 240
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
41.9% Average
Memory 71
1-Core 33.1
2-Core 79.8
40% 61.3 Pts
4-Core 76.8
8-Core 78.4
10% 77.6 Pts
64-Core 79
5% 79 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4200
HP(103C 2AB1) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
0.6% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 0.47
0% 0.85 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 0.17
Splatting 1.3
1% 0.82 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.6%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721064CLA332 640GB
469GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JPGO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 58 83 88 81 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 96.7
Write 109
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 79.3
62% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL10-8GBXL F3-12800CL10-8GBXL Elpida EBJ21UE8BBF0-DJ-F Elpida EBJ21UE8BBF0-DJ-F 20GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 8192, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.8% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 8.9
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback