Gigabyte GA-H81M-H

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	95.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H81M-H (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150810
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '20 at 14:55
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4590-$188 151,366 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 86.3 1-Core 102 2-Core 204 75% 131 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 380 50% 376 Pts	64-Core 375 23% 375 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3281) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Lighting 74.9 Reflection 73.5 Parallax 64 61% 70.8 fps	MRender 66.3 Gravity 68.5 Splatting 71.2 56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 131GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 369 401 350 334 333 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	Read 443 Write 421 Mixed 369 SusWrite 343 89% 394 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 54.4 4K Mixed 40.6 134% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 358 DQ Write 313 DQ Mixed 330 249% 334 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 930GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 179 187 189 187 188 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 165 Mixed 35.6 SusWrite 186 102% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 64D0JKHHJ 2x8GB 778 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	58.5% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 18 59% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 18.4 SC Mixed 17.9 48% 17 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H81M-H Builds (Compare 1,361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-H - $112

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	206x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	203x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	105x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	252x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	76x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	110x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	63x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	53x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	26x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	26x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $290

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16