Novatech BB-180016

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics40.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemNovatech BB-180016  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME X370-PRO
Memory26.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180122
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 25 '20 at 06:20
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$230
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 217
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 799
76% 613 Pts
64-Core 1,181
79% 1,181 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$188
Asus(1043 0505) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1305 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.3% Average
Lighting 47.9
Reflection 65.9
Parallax 67.6
40% 60.5 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 50.5
Splatting 54.4
39% 57.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 57%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1879
Write 1,257
Mixed 580
272% 1,238 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 50.3
186% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 606
DQ Write 435
DQ Mixed 472
366% 504 MB/s
Poor: 141% Great: 234%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60
464GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 560 559 570 573 574 578 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 729
Write 574
Mixed 610
SusWrite 569
139% 621 MB/s
4K Read 58.5
4K Write 94.8
4K Mixed 70.4
229% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 683
DQ Write 540
DQ Mixed 597
451% 607 MB/s
Poor: 209%
This bench: 163%
Great: 318%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$74
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 161 164 169 166 168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 141
Write 126
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 164
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.7
209% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 92%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-00A7B0 500GB
415GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4 4 4 3.9 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 33
Mixed 29
SusWrite 3.9
32% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
111% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 30%
WD Elements 107C 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 89 89 90 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
47% Average
Read 133
Write 139
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 89.3
147% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 47%
Great: 59%
Samsung SSD 840 EVO 500G 500GB
391GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 31 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 37.2
Write 34.3
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 30.6
47% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 13.5
1,018% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 14
DQ Write 16.9
DQ Mixed 15.1
1,140% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 179%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3000 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CL16-18-18 D4-3000 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.3% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 25.2
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 22.8
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical BB-180016 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

System: Novatech BB-180016

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $478
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback