Gigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive334% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 24 '20 at 22:49
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 53%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 134
2-Core 261
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 488
62% 469 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Lighting 46.7
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 38.7
38% 38.9 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 36.9
32% 38.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
871GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1394 2024 1664 1454 1477 1434 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
334% Outstanding
Read 2,145
Write 2000
Mixed 1,548
SusWrite 1,574
408% 1,817 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 88.4
284% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,562
DQ Write 1,291
DQ Mixed 1,420
1,065% 1,424 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 334%
Great: 410%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
12GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 410
Write 397
Mixed 353
86% 387 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 59.1
193% 72 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 358
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
598GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 151 143 137 151 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 146
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 148
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 114%
Kingston DataTraveler R3.0 USB 3.0 64GB-$30
47GB free, PID 168e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 56.9
Write 43.5
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 0.2
35% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.2
75% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB-$96
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.2% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 21
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 20.4
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270-Gaming K3 Builds (Compare 2,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3 - $206

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $711
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback