Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ 4,133 User benchmarks, average bench 35% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	36.3% Below average	Memory 62.4 1-Core 32 2-Core 62.9 35% 52.4 Pts	4-Core 62.9 8-Core 59.6 8% 61.2 Pts	64-Core 62.7 4% 62.7 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 43%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 4,836 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Asus(1043 8234) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 309.08 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Nvidia GeForce 8500 GT 4,580 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.18% Terrible	Lighting 1.03 Reflection 2.23 Parallax 0.44 1% 1.23 fps	MRender 3.76 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.28 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.18% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ct500mx5 0 500GB 2,476 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 228GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 112 160 153 155 159 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.2% Average	Read 190 Write 158 Mixed 186 SusWrite 145 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 34.6 4K Mixed 28.2 80% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 43.8 DQ Write 88.9 DQ Mixed 53.6 44% 62.1 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 115 168 161 169 168 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	Read 167 Write 145 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 152 97% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 114%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 402GB free Firmware: 1AG0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 62 62 62 63 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 79.5 Write 41.2 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 61.8 42% 56.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 1024, 1024, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.2% Very poor	MC Read 3.7 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.37 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 3.9 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+AMDBench 35%, 4,133 samples	3x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+AMDBench 37%, 5,400 samples	1x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+AMDBench 39%, 3,286 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	2x
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	1x
GeForce GTS 250NvidiaBench 7%, 14,881 samples	1x

SSD
WDS1 20G2G0A-00JH 120GBWDCBench 39%, 6 samples	1x
R5SL120G 120GBBench 62%, 596 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16