HP ProLiant ML150 G2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP ProLiant ML150 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Nocona/Lindenhurst-VS/Hance Rapid
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060630
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 24 '20 at 14:27
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.60GHz
Proc 1, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Memory 49.3
1-Core 28.9
2-Core 52.1
29% 43.4 Pts
4-Core 54.7
8-Core 55.1
7% 54.9 Pts
64-Core 55.4
3% 55.4 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 37%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ICP Drive #00 HA #0 2TB
390GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 41 38 39 40 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.9% Poor
Read 106
Write 71.1
Mixed 83
SusWrite 40.1
17% 75 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 13.6
4K Mixed 17.7
62% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 31.9
DQ Write 17.4
DQ Mixed 10.4
12% 19.9 MB/s
Adaptec RAID 1 500GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 113
Write 47.2
Mixed 43.1
SusWrite 21
41% 56 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 66%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$39
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 22 22 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 93.8
Write 83.1
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 21.4
45% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 86%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$39
920GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 22 22 22 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 102
Write 86.8
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 21.9
48% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 86%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 72 72 73 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 63.7
Write 96
Mixed 37
SusWrite 71.7
93% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.6
248% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.11% Terrible
MC Read 2.6
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 2.6
7% 2.57 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 3.1
9% 3.13 GB/s
Latency 163
24% 163 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 9.11%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback