Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 24 '20 at 13:11
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$506
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Memory 72.5
1-Core 153
2-Core 306
94% 177 Pts
4-Core 613
8-Core 1,227
108% 920 Pts
64-Core 3,083
191% 3,083 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Lighting 39
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 37.8
32% 36 fps
MRender 39.4
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 36.1
31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 151 152 151 153 151 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 444
Mixed 366
SusWrite 179
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 54
182% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 185
139% 187 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 115%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
402GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2402 2132 1064 1074 1073 1073 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
355% Outstanding
Read 2,543
Write 2,404
Mixed 1,756
SusWrite 1,470
458% 2,043 MB/s
4K Read 67.9
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 95.1
320% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,539
DQ Write 1,373
DQ Mixed 1,437
1,082% 1,449 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 355%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
254GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 446 445 446 446 446 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 443
Mixed 405
SusWrite 430
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 57.2
187% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 185
140% 187 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 27.3
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 25.3
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 95.7
42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,822 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $921
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback