bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
System
MotherboardDFI LP DK P55-T3eH9
Memory0.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100827
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateOct 24 '20 at 12:34
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 126
57% 91.2 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 252
30% 229 Pts
64-Core 249
15% 249 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1236 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
24% Poor
Lighting 28.3
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 35.8
23% 32 fps
MRender 30.8
Gravity 27.9
Splatting 34.5
26% 31.1 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 201 219 224 227 225 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.6% Average
Read 203
Write 171
Mixed 164
SusWrite 210
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 22.9
77% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 33.1
DQ Write 84.6
DQ Mixed 38.6
35% 52.1 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 128%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
74GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 52 65 64 63 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 73
Write 69
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 60.5
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 65%
WD Elements 2TB
254GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 25 25 26 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 28
Write 22.5
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 25
32% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0
29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
35.5% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 11.9
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 3.2
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback