Asus PRIME H270-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics47% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H270-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 24 '20 at 00:23
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 47%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
18% Very poor
Memory 25.3
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 43.8
29% 45.9 Pts
4-Core 61.7
8-Core 67.9
9% 64.8 Pts
64-Core 60.7
4% 60.7 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 18%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47% Average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 37.4
Parallax 78.8
36% 53.5 fps
MRender 82.9
Gravity 73.8
Splatting 90.7
68% 82.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 47%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
542GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 220 219 523 680 630 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 455
Write 376
Mixed 285
SusWrite 403
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 16.9
77% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 265
209% 287 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 295%
Toshiba MK5055GSX 500GB-$33
444GB free
Firmware: FG001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 45 53 61 69 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
31% Below average
Read 53.5
Write 50
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 54.6
34% 46.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31%
Great: 42%
Toshiba MK5055GSX 500GB-$33
98GB free
Firmware: FG001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 33 42 43 47 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 73.8
Write 72.3
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 39.5
40% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 42%
Toshiba StorE HDD 1TB
503GB free, PID 0b15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 1.6 1.7 3.8 4.8 4.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
6.79% Terrible
Read 31.2
Write 31.5
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 2.9
26% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.79%
Great: 19%
Seagate Portable 1TB
833GB free, PID 2332
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 20 22 29 34 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 34.2
Mixed 16
SusWrite 25.7
36% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2133C14/8G KHX2133C14/8G Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
33.5% Below average
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 12.3
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 284
14% 284 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H270-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,811 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270-PLUS - $3,094

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $3,464
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback