Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics7.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '20 at 17:30
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$300
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 89.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
91% 159 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 796
84% 655 Pts
64-Core 965
65% 965 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
7.18% Terrible
Lighting 8.43
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 9.06
7% 9.9 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 16.1
7% 12 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.18%
Great: 7%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk G5 BICS4 1TB
611GB free
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 383 370 353 369 370 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 487
Mixed 398
SusWrite 383
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 53.3
189% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 256
219% 322 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 118%
Great: 115%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$100
232GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 213 213 212 213 213 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 463
Mixed 322
SusWrite 235
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 59.3
207% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 341
262% 357 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 115%
Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$70
868GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 79 156 151 161 168 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 43.2
Write 104
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 134
57% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
50% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$64
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.2% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 18.3
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 19.9
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 2,627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $1,449
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $153Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback