Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180518
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateOct 23 '20 at 17:14
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8086K-$692
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 132
2-Core 257
93% 162 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 784
79% 628 Pts
64-Core 991
66% 991 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$808
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 155
Reflection 167
Parallax 172
128% 165 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 157
Splatting 116
71% 129 fps
Poor: 114%
This bench: 122%
Great: 147%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$95
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,892
Write 1,732
Mixed 649
315% 1,424 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 57.1
210% 80 MB/s
DQ Read 1,167
DQ Write 912
DQ Mixed 1,081
798% 1,054 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 260%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$70
23GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 500
Write 486
Mixed 403
103% 463 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 64
217% 77.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 357
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 125%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$79
780GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 82 82 85 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 74.8
Write 69.2
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 82.4
51% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$80
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 92 93 92 92 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 92.8
Write 81
Mixed 71
SusWrite 91.5
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.9
187% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
88% Excellent
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 25.4
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 28
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 51.7
77% 51.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $835
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $268Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback