Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180518
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateOct 23 '20 at 17:14
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8086K-$399
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 135
2-Core 272
94% 168 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 836
77% 644 Pts
64-Core 1,074
66% 1,074 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
115% Outstanding
Lighting 155
Reflection 167
Parallax 172
126% 165 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 157
Splatting 116
105% 129 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,892
Write 1,732
Mixed 649
315% 1,424 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 57.1
210% 80 MB/s
DQ Read 1,167
DQ Write 912
DQ Mixed 1,081
798% 1,054 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
23GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 500
Write 486
Mixed 403
103% 463 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 64
217% 77.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 357
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
780GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 82 82 85 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 74.8
Write 69.2
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 82.4
51% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 92 93 92 92 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 92.8
Write 81
Mixed 71
SusWrite 91.5
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.9
187% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
88% Excellent
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 25.4
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 28
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 51.7
77% 51.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 88%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback