Asrock 970A-G/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock 970A-G/3.1  (all builds)
Memory18.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 23 '20 at 17:13
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.75 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.9% Average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 42.6
2-Core 75
41% 62.5 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 204
22% 173 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3563 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52% Above average
Lighting 73.4
Reflection 99.4
Parallax 115
60% 96 fps
MRender 0
Gravity 55.7
Splatting 66.9
37% 40.9 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 52%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$39
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 005C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 139 137 138 139 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 738
Write 284
Mixed 331
SusWrite 139
82% 373 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 36
117% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 194
154% 218 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 165%
KingFast 240GB
185GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 320 278 268 269 272 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 432
Write 363
Mixed 363
SusWrite 288
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 33.3
104% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 103
111% 187 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 94%
KingFast 240GB
221GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 326 273 271 275 269 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 422
Write 352
Mixed 356
SusWrite 290
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 30.4
102% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 102
107% 177 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 94%
Asrock RAM Disk 3GB
1GB free
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1718
Write 1,436
Mixed 1,634
356% 1,596 MB/s
4K Read 88.5
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 80.2
277% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 313
241% 328 MB/s
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
698GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 152 152 152 153 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 76.4
Mixed 77.9
SusWrite 152
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 1866 CL10 Series Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 24GB
1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
33.8% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 17.6
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 9.7
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $269
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback