Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory15.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateOct 23 '20 at 15:08
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 66
1-Core 138
2-Core 258
82% 154 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 854
82% 674 Pts
64-Core 1,299
80% 1,299 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.3% Very good
Lighting 94.3
Reflection 84.1
Parallax 146
77% 108 fps
MRender 84.2
Gravity 97.2
Splatting 119
84% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1048
Write 1,130
Mixed 523
200% 900 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 45.5
162% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 837
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 375
308% 461 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Samsung 860 1TB
162GB free
Firmware: RVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 186 174 79 80 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 368
Write 366
Mixed 349
SusWrite 141
69% 306 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 27.1
4K Mixed 19.7
62% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 77.7
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 94.6
81% 116 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 116%
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$31
105GB free
Firmware: BXW7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 31 33 33 35 44 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
471% Outstanding
Read 5,432
Write 49.9
Mixed 94.9
SusWrite 34
292% 1,403 MB/s
4K Read 622
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 5.9
952% 210 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 471%
Great: 243%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
719GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 185 172 186 197 197 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 424
Write 359
Mixed 315
SusWrite 197
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 16
53% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 98.6
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 123
97% 132 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 159 144 156 157 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 132
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 158
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64.9% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 25.7
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 26.1
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $940
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback