Koloe X58

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Intel Thurley
Motherboard	Koloe X58 (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190731
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 23 '20 at 12:43
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5660 6,950 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 93 1-Core 70.8 2-Core 141 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 420 43% 347 Pts	64-Core 526 32% 526 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E347) CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.1 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	53% Above average	Lighting 65.8 Reflection 68.2 Parallax 81.4 54% 71.8 fps	MRender 69 Gravity 66.6 Splatting 56.7 52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF5100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 18 102 136 141 137 MB/s Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.2% Average	Read 249 Write 220 Mixed 202 SusWrite 122 44% 199 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 29.4 4K Mixed 18 66% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 44.6 DQ Write 66.1 DQ Mixed 39.6 34% 50.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 56%
WD WD3200AVJS-63WDA0 320GB 7,100 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 180GB free Firmware: 01.03A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 103 103 103 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Read 107 Write 106 Mixed 67.4 SusWrite 103 70% 95.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 59%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB 7,326 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 29GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 28.1 18% 28.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown MXIC 25L8005 37GB 309 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 4266, 33 MHz 4096, 33792 MB Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 11.2 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 8.5 23% 7.9 GB/s	Latency 62.1 64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Koloe X58

CPU
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples	87x
Xeon X5660IntelBench 71%, 6,950 samples	78x
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples	58x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	34x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	31x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	30x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	25x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	16x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	13x

RAM
MXIC 25L8005 41GBUnknownBench 36%, 466 samples	193x
MXIC 25L8005 37GBUnknownBench 37%, 309 samples	87x
25L8005 1x33GBMXICBench 23%, 218 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16