Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5 368 User benchmarks, average bench 78% U3E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Memory 80.4 1-Core 116 2-Core 168 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 170 22% 168 Pts	64-Core 174 11% 174 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.02 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Lighting 20.8 Reflection 16.2 Parallax 19 17% 18.7 fps	MRender 23.7 Gravity 21.7 Splatting 0.04 11% 15.1 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 17%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8TB8U256G1001 256GB 4,613 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4120101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 121 103 106 106 107 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 401 Write 385 Mixed 253 SusWrite 117 64% 289 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 79.9 4K Mixed 36.9 128% 47.4 MB/s	DQ Read 40.2 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 184 128% 154 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GU7AFR8N-TF 2x8GB 455 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	MC Read 25.4 MC Write 29.4 MC Mixed 26.3 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 29.1 SC Mixed 19.4 62% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 79%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16