MSI MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C94
MotherboardMSI MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94)  (all builds)
Memory59 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '20 at 20:47
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$273
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 78.8
1-Core 129
2-Core 270
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 818
85% 667 Pts
64-Core 1,081
72% 1,081 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 92%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 180GB-$245
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 320
Write 199
Mixed 238
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 34.1
133% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 129
121% 190 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 83%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$53
118GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 383 381 381 382 383 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 491
Mixed 453
SusWrite 395
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 65.7
220% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 373
281% 375 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 130%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 37.3
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 34.5
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94) Builds (Compare 938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $927
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $153Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback