NEC PC-MJ30AEZ75

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNEC PC-MJ30AEZ75  (all builds)
MotherboardNEC MS-7415L2B
Memory0.9 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080417
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 22 '20 at 14:26
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
SOCKET775 M/B, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Memory 56.9
1-Core 20.6
2-Core 69.2
32% 48.9 Pts
4-Core 82.2
8-Core 77.5
11% 79.8 Pts
64-Core 72.8
4% 72.8 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
67GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 92 96 95 95 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 91.7
Write 84.8
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 93.5
62% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 70%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 61 63 68 71 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 26.7
Write 69.3
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 59.4
33% 45.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
42% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 4
13% 4.7 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.33 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback