Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Notebook P65_P67RGRERA (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook P65_P67RGRERA
Memory	26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160105
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 22 '20 at 09:35
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 98.2 2-Core 182 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 548 53% 434 Pts	64-Core 514 32% 514 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980M 14,160 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Clevo(1558 6781) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	43.6% Average	Lighting 53.1 Reflection 54 Parallax 48.2 43% 51.8 fps	MRender 60 Gravity 51.5 Splatting 51.3 44% 54.3 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung NVMe MZVPV256HDGL-00000 256GB 5,877 User benchmarks, average bench 201% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 378 361 375 380 350 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	160% Outstanding	Read 1,406 Write 815 Mixed 580 SusWrite 376 176% 794 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 133 4K Mixed 41.3 178% 70 MB/s	DQ Read 1,000 DQ Write 245 DQ Mixed 411 357% 552 MB/s
Poor: 133% ↑ This bench: 160% Great: 247%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 115GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 403 431 421 399 391 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 442 Write 429 Mixed 362 SusWrite 398 92% 408 MB/s	4K Read 43.1 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 46.5 183% 66.5 MB/s	DQ Read 350 DQ Write 307 DQ Mixed 328 246% 328 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 134%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 444GB free Firmware: AX101U SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 86 87 86 87 87 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 91 Write 93.3 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 85.6 55% 75.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB 5,417 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	82.2% Excellent	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 26.4 84% 29.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 32.1 SC Mixed 26 71% 25 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 87%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	156x
Core i7-6820HKIntelBench 69%, 20,362 samples	24x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	55x
GeForce GTX 980MNvidiaBench 39%, 10,379 samples	46x
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	40x

SSD
850 EVO M.2 250GBSamsungBench 102%, 28,058 samples	25x
850 EVO M.2 500GBSamsungBench 110%, 25,072 samples	14x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $250Bench 199%, 40,327 samples	6x

RAM
M471A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 20,956 samples	27x
16ATF1G64HZ-2G1A2 2x8GBMicronBench 69%, 6,021 samples	15x
HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBKingstonBench 77%, 2,917 samples	14x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16