Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Battle cruiser	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	82.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180621
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '20 at 20:18
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	42%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Memory 88.3 1-Core 122 2-Core 212 81% 140 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 582 57% 469 Pts	64-Core 592 37% 592 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Zotac(19DA 4520) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.4% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 99.3 Parallax 96.9 85% 100 fps	MRender 126 Gravity 91.8 Splatting 75.1 77% 97.7 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 399GB free Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 274 316 300 289 333 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 197 Write 97.7 Mixed 81 SusWrite 303 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 18.9 4K Mixed 9.7 41% 13.7 MB/s	DQ Read 8.9 DQ Write 13.2 DQ Mixed 14.6 10% 12.2 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 60 88 94 119 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	73.2% Very good	Read 169 Write 152 Mixed 71 SusWrite 86.2 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB 22,274 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	61.7% Good	MC Read 25.5 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 19.9 64% 22.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 18.7 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S Builds (Compare 1,330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S - $113

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	702x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	180x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	163x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	392x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	105x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	91x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	34x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	32x
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	26x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	99x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	75x
DDR4 2666 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 83%, 9,905 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $457

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16