Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	41.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200714
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '20 at 17:08
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	39%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87 71,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Memory 72.9 1-Core 115 2-Core 230 76% 139 Pts	4-Core 408 8-Core 645 65% 526 Pts	64-Core 642 40% 642 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% EVGA(3842 6160) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.9% Average	Lighting 47.3 Reflection 54.6 Parallax 44.5 39% 48.8 fps	MRender 67.3 Gravity 47.4 Splatting 61.6 48% 58.8 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$37 109,999 User benchmarks, average bench 244% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 943 749 763 734 662 650 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	238% Outstanding	Read 2,023 Write 2,237 Mixed 1,768 SusWrite 750 380% 1,694 MB/s	4K Read 49.6 4K Write 147 4K Mixed 72.3 246% 89.7 MB/s	DQ Read 846 DQ Write 722 DQ Mixed 781 586% 783 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 238% Great: 297%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 776GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 193 197 198 197 197 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 200 Write 192 Mixed 83.3 SusWrite 195 122% 168 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSBK.8FBD 2x8GB 3,023 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	89% Excellent	MC Read 34.3 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 29.8 93% 32.5 GB/s	SC Read 21.6 SC Write 32.1 SC Mixed 25.5 75% 26.4 GB/s	Latency 94.8 42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	56x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	34x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	27x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	26x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	24x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	8x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	9x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $293

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16