| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 86.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20171108 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 21 '20 at 13:38 |
| Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
88.7%
Excellent
|
92% 167 Pts
|
75% 607 Pts
|
45% 728 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 8671) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
86.4%
Excellent
|
86% 102 fps
|
87% 110 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
106% 474 MB/s
|
172% 64.8 MB/s
|
217% 321 MB/s
| |
|
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
101GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 74 73 74 73 MB/s
|
25.3%
Poor
|
26% 35.1 MB/s
|
99% 0.57 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
318GB free
Firmware: SC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 138 137 129 131 146 MB/s
|
48.6%
Average
|
42% 57.2 MB/s
|
130% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$161
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
63.7%
Good
|
66% 23 GB/s
|
45% 15.8 GB/s
|
59% 68.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H270-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,297 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 349x |
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 202x |
| Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 199x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 197x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 152x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 131x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $383 |