PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 24.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P5QL PRO (all builds) |
Memory | 1.6 GB free of 5 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090701 |
Uptime | 3.7 Days |
Run Date | Oct 21 '20 at 07:36 |
Run Duration | 119 Seconds |
Run User | UKR-User |
Background CPU | 34% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
|
31%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 85D2) 2GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HDT725025VLA380 250GB-$132
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5DOA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 25 20 20 21 33 MB/s
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 5GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 1024, 1024 MB
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 43x |
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples | 28x |
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 20x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 13x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 13x |
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 46% - Average | Total price: $209 |