Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200513
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 21 '20 at 07:00
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 69.4
1-Core 145
2-Core 286
88% 167 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 805
85% 681 Pts
64-Core 1013
63% 1013 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.3% Average
Lighting 48.3
Reflection 64.7
Parallax 72.3
39% 61.8 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 50.4
Splatting 52.7
45% 55.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 48 48 48 47 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
338GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 140 139 139 137 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 148
Write 128
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 138
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 108%
Samsung HD400LJ 400GB-$85
190GB free
Firmware: ZZ100-14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 50 50 50 49 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 57.7
Write 49
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 48.6
36% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 41%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
2TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 58 58 58 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 65.2
Write 57.8
Mixed 55
SusWrite 58
80% 59 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.8% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 27
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 25.3
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $691
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback