PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 970M Pro3 (all builds) |
Memory | 16.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160617 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 20 '20 at 23:05 |
Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
36.2%
Below average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.38
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
583GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 98 90 88 80 77 MB/s
|
68.2%
Good
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
55GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 22 24 24 23 23 MB/s
|
11.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5471-066.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 9905584-015.A00LF 99U5584-005.A00LF 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
|
24.7%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 289x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 228x |
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 70x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 92x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 51x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 47x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $217 |