| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 24.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Cyberpowerpc C SERIES (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASRock B360M Xtreme |
| Memory | 8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1722 x 1070 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190319 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 20 '20 at 22:18 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 57% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
86.2%
Excellent
|
85% 146 Pts
|
60% 478 Pts
|
36% 584 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.38
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.3%
Average
|
63% 62 fps
|
22% 30.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 62 2.8 38 1 0.6 MB/s
|
24.8%
Poor
|
37% 164 MB/s
|
28% 9.97 MB/s
|
41% 75.4 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
734GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 163 160 159 165 166 MB/s
|
96.8%
Outstanding
|
108% 147 MB/s
|
179% 1.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
60.2%
Good
|
62% 21.7 GB/s
|
26% 9 GB/s
|
93% 42.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,532 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 2,319x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 681x |
| Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples | 354x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 1,302x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 534x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 326x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 100% - Outstanding | Total price: $280 |