Monster TULPAR T5 V17.1

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Monster TULPAR T5 V17.1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Standard Standard
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190222
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '20 at 19:39
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	18%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Memory 82.8 1-Core 106 2-Core 178 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 283 8-Core 375 42% 329 Pts	64-Core 449 28% 449 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Device(1D05 1045) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8873 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	13.9% Very poor	Lighting 10 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 31.8 8% 17.8 fps	MRender 9.67 Gravity 29.8 Splatting 45.4 25% 28.3 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB 13,215 User benchmarks, average bench 190% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXD7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1059 360 303 305 305 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	Read 808 Write 1,031 Mixed 780 SusWrite 438 172% 765 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 49 4K Mixed 28.1 113% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 882 DQ Write 728 DQ Mixed 823 612% 811 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 249%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB 145,911 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 905GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 168 167 173 177 175 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	95.1% Outstanding	Read 160 Write 156 Mixed 78.2 SusWrite 172 103% 141 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 230% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	MC Read 27.3 MC Write 30.1 MC Mixed 22.3 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 34.5 SC Mixed 23.8 73% 25.6 GB/s	Latency 75.5 53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T5 V17.1 Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V17.1

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	186x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	106x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	80x

SSD
XPG SX6000 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBAdata $40Bench 119%, 8,737 samples	39x
XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBAdataBench 177%, 12,504 samples	22x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBAdata $59Bench 213%, 34,063 samples	18x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	45x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	26x
M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 40%, 36,753 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 31% - Below average

Total price: $40

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16