Asrock FM2A75M Pro4+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A75M Pro4+ (all builds)
Memory	6.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131119
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '20 at 14:29
Run Duration	235 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	65%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 740K 4,318 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Memory 78.8 1-Core 18.8 2-Core 26.5 34% 41.4 Pts	4-Core 18.4 8-Core 28.8 3% 23.6 Pts	64-Core 33 2% 33 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140 47,409 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Gigabyte(1458 226C) CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Lighting 36.1 Reflection 32.8 Parallax 42.5 29% 37.2 fps	MRender 29.2 Gravity 31.7 Splatting 36.2 27% 32.4 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 26%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 415 94 86 79 78 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
WD WD3200JD-22K 320GB 730 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 271GB free Firmware: 08.05J08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 49 57 58 58 57 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Read 59.8 Write 56.9 Mixed 40.8 SusWrite 54 39% 52.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 180% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 36%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 828GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 44 48 49 46 48 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	Read 29.4 Write 36.9 Mixed 26 SusWrite 46.7 26% 34.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 53% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL9-10-9 D3-1866 2x8GB 571 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	24.7% Poor	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 9.1 24% 8.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 7.3 14% 5 GB/s	Latency 82.9 48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A75M Pro4+ Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75M Pro4+

CPU
Athlon II X4 750KAMD $45Bench 51%, 5,882 samples	4x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	3x
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	2x
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples	2x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	2x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x
INTENSO 256GBBench 72%, 4,055 samples	1x
840 Evo 500GBSamsung $150Bench 103%, 68,337 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Nanya M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-CG Nanya M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-CG 16GBHynixBench 31%, 7 samples	2x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GBCrucialBench 57%, 14,299 samples	1x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 35% - Below average

Total price: $145

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16