To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	MICRO-STAR MS-6657
Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090922
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '20 at 02:30
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9900-$159 1,008 User benchmarks, average bench 41% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Memory 68.7 1-Core 42.3 2-Core 82.2 42% 64.4 Pts	4-Core 84.6 8-Core 86 11% 85.3 Pts	64-Core 83.2 5% 83.2 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia ION 1,623 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 4570) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	0.92% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.27 Parallax 0.38 1% 0.88 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.52 1% 1.39 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.92% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 268GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 102 98 99 104 105 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.3% Below average	Read 117 Write 83 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 98.6 21% 92.6 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 42.2 4K Mixed 21.3 81% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 77.5 DQ Write 87 DQ Mixed 74.8 58% 79.8 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 102%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 54GB free Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 22 36 71 40 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.9% Poor	Read 127 Write 98 Mixed 105 SusWrite 57.9 22% 96.8 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 24.1 4K Mixed 14.8 57% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 68.7 DQ Write 57.6 DQ Mixed 36.2 34% 54.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16HTF51264HZ-800C1 2x4GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM SDRAM 2048 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 3.6 14% 4.8 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 4.6 12% 4.33 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,570 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	712x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	278x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	263x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	615x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	102x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16