HP p7-1026

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p7-1026  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AB1
Memory6.6 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '20 at 01:30
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 840T
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 78.1
1-Core 44.9
2-Core 84.7
46% 69.2 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 155
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6770
Asus(1043 0414) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 12.8
0% 7.92 fps
MRender 9.95
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 12.1
9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST380811AS 80GB-$99
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 22 22 12 13 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 34
Write 17.8
Mixed 17.8
SusWrite 15.8
16% 21.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
64% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 40%
Seagate ST380811AS 80GB-$99
28GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 23 22 14 15 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 69
Write 25.8
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 17.1
27% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 40%
Generic Mass Storage 1GB
1GB free, PID 0005
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8 7.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.27% Terrible
Read 15.7
Write 8
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 8.1
13% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.27%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 10GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.6% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 7.7
23% 8 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 7.1
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p7-1026 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1026

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $42
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback