| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Asus M32CD4-K (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK M32CD4-K |
| Memory | 4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170106 |
| Uptime | 9 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 19 '20 at 20:50 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | SWE-User |
| Background CPU | 22% |
PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.3%
Very good
|
74% 130 Pts
|
42% 323 Pts
|
24% 381 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 872C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56%
Above average
|
57% 67.8 fps
|
54% 66.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sandisk SD8SBAT128G1002 128GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2317002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 160 174 171 173 169 MB/s
|
57%
Above average
|
50% 227 MB/s
|
79% 33.8 MB/s
|
84% 140 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
42GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 105 104 104 104 MB/s
|
74.3%
Very good
|
76% 105 MB/s
|
127% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
38.7%
Below average
|
37% 12.8 GB/s
|
33% 11.6 GB/s
|
58% 69 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M32CD4-K Builds (Compare 688 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus M32CD4-K
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 394x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 262x |
| Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 207x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 91x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 50x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $196 |