Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190425
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 19 '20 at 17:12
Run Duration	281 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 69.9 1-Core 110 2-Core 219 73% 133 Pts	4-Core 395 8-Core 715 67% 555 Pts	64-Core 1,195 74% 1,195 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.2% Average	Lighting 33.1 Reflection 109 Parallax 97.2 27% 79.9 fps	MRender 94.3 Gravity 98.3 Splatting 101 81% 98 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,514 Write 1,916 Mixed 1424 432% 1,951 MB/s	4K Read 57.6 4K Write 60.8 4K Mixed 56.4 192% 58.3 MB/s	DQ Read 552 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 351 270% 377 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
SK hynix SC300 2.5 7MM 128GB 561 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 92GB free Firmware: 20100P00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 0.9 2 0.7 1.3 1.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 486 Write 7.7 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 1.3 26% 125 MB/s	4K Read 47.8 4K Write 8.5 4K Mixed 14.6 96% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 345 DQ Write 5.6 DQ Mixed 25.3 56% 125 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 80%
Intel 530 Series 480GB-$301 1,386 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 7GB free Firmware: DC32 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 438 Write 290 Mixed 314 77% 348 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 17 4K Mixed 20.7 75% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 54.4 DQ Mixed 62.2 65% 112 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 68%
Tcsunbow X3 480GB 2,146 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 75GB free Firmware: Q0526A SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 293 255 255 254 255 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Read 312 Write 302 Mixed 258 SusWrite 269 64% 285 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 49.7 4K Mixed 37.2 128% 40.8 MB/s	DQ Read 147 DQ Write 207 DQ Mixed 96.4 96% 150 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 99%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB 50,772 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 808GB free Firmware: 2BC10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 115 117 117 114 117 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 107 Write 81.4 Mixed 65.6 SusWrite 115 68% 92.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 1.1 220% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 70%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 108GB free Firmware: GG2OACA0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 32 28 21 23 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	Read 67.1 Write 63.6 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 33 35% 48 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 58%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71 21,137 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 135GB free Firmware: PB4OC64G SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 16 26 20 10 23 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 32GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	73.5% Very good	MC Read 27.6 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 25 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 20.7 SC Write 28.5 SC Mixed 23.2 69% 24.1 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $160Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)