Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z270X-Ultra Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming (all builds)
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170126
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 19 '20 at 12:06
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Memory 83.9 1-Core 141 2-Core 278 91% 168 Pts	4-Core 476 8-Core 776 77% 626 Pts	64-Core 772 48% 772 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000 5,678 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 1190) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 361.91 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Lighting 30 Reflection 30.3 Parallax 27.7 24% 29.4 fps	MRender 27 Gravity 27.8 Splatting 28.2 23% 27.7 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
KINGSTON 480GB 279 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 95 24 48 68 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 408 Write 95.3 Mixed 196 SusWrite 60.8 42% 190 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 72.1 4K Mixed 34.6 94% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 313 DQ Write 46.7 DQ Mixed 180 132% 180 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 101%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 32GB free Firmware: MX4O SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 173 170 174 169 170 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	99.4% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 161 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 171 96% 133 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 108%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB 7,184 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 0GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 3.2 3.5 3.9 4.3 4 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 21.8 Write 3.3 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 3.8 8% 8.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 2.8 197% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42 131,007 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.8% Good	MC Read 26.4 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 20.3 70% 24.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 19.8 59% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 95%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	86x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	65x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	56x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	175x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	72x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	40x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $938

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16