Samsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Samsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP355V5C-S0BTR
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130704
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 19 '20 at 08:47
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-4600M APU 5,886 User benchmarks, average bench 43% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	43.5% Average	Memory 64.1 1-Core 37.1 2-Core 85.6 40% 62.3 Pts	4-Core 133 8-Core 145 18% 139 Pts	64-Core 145 9% 145 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660G 4,227 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sanyo(144D C0DA) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	5.21% Terrible	Lighting 6.37 Reflection 7.27 Parallax 6.12 5% 6.59 fps	MRender 5.33 Gravity 5.43 Splatting 7.83 5% 6.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.21% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFMP1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 319 119 121 122 122 MB/s Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	65.2% Good	Read 277 Write 119 Mixed 212 SusWrite 189 44% 199 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 56.2 4K Mixed 30.5 113% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 162 125% 172 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 95%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB 7,326 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 4GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 14 19 19 17 19 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 51.9 Write 29.6 Mixed 0.2 SusWrite 17.7 28% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 31% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GB 329 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 12 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 11 25% 8.73 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC

CPU
A8-4500M APUAMDBench 39%, 9,726 samples	18x
A6-4400M APUAMDBench 35%, 6,363 samples	10x
A10-4600M APUAMDBench 43%, 5,886 samples	9x

GPU
Radeon HD 7640GAMDBench 3%, 7,719 samples	18x
Radeon HD 7520GAMDBench 2%, 4,996 samples	10x
Radeon HD 7660GAMDBench 4%, 4,227 samples	9x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	4x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5273EB0-CK0 M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 28%, 329 samples	8x
CT102464BF186D.M16 CT8G3S186DM.C16FN 16GBUnknownBench 33%, 7 samples	4x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 31%, 243 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $29

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16