MSI X99A GODLIKE GAMING CARBON (MS-7883)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7883
MotherboardMSI X99A GODLIKE GAMING CARBON (MS-7883)  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '20 at 22:45
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-6950X-$914
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 128
2-Core 258
93% 161 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 1,010
94% 762 Pts
64-Core 1647
110% 1647 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$450
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3788 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Lighting 424
Reflection 357
Parallax 449
111% 410 fps
MRender 409
Gravity 411
Splatting 255
121% 358 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 120%
Great: 119%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1252 309 310 310 311 308 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 2,395
Write 1,478
Mixed 1,034
SusWrite 467
297% 1,343 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 78.2
276% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 974
DQ Write 842
DQ Mixed 963
707% 926 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 250%
Great: 278%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$110
914GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 483 481 480 480 481 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 477
Mixed 432
SusWrite 482
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 59.3
201% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 128%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$110
528GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 484 481 480 480 481 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 478
Mixed 458
SusWrite 482
108% 479 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 55.1
188% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 355
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 124%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$110
926GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 471 472 472 471 472 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 471
Mixed 450
SusWrite 472
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 55.4
187% 67.3 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 123%
Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
356GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 186 185 184 155 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 149
Write 137
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 179
88% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4400 C19 Series 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 4000 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
141% Outstanding
MC Read 58.3
MC Write 57.9
MC Mixed 50.5
159% 55.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 23.5
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 51.6
78% 51.6 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 141%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99A GODLIKE GAMING CARBON (MS-7883) Builds (Compare 225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X99A GODLIKE GAMING CARBON (MS-7883)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $1,639
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $180Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $142Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $275Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $544SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback