Asus P8H61-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120725
Uptime	6.5 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '17 at 18:58
Run Duration	252 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2100-$49 63,701 User benchmarks, average bench 51% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	62% Good	Memory 87.6 1-Core 84.6 2-Core 154 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 214 29% 214 Pts	64-Core 214 13% 214 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT 20,826 User benchmarks, average bench 4% XFX(1682 2362) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	4.94% Terrible	Lighting 5.97 Reflection 8.73 Parallax 1.97 5% 5.56 fps	MRender 8.76 Gravity 4.1 Splatting 6.09 5% 6.32 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.94% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6203 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 49 (64) Unknown 100 100 1799136 (65) Unknown 100 100 251840 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 95 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 99 99 545 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1293 (B7) Unknown 100 100 5 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 33 100 180390133793 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 99 99 1 (E9) Unknown 100 100 3046 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1212 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2315 (F2) Unknown 100 100 3292 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	39.8% Below average	Read 363 Write 200 Mixed 146 52% 236 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 13.7 4K Mixed 1.27 44% 12.8 MB/s	DQ Read 24.7 DQ Write 26.1 DQ Mixed 21.8 17% 24.2 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 465GB free Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 228252128 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 7066 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 94109857 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 16675 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 137 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 56 588775457 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 66 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 40 40 120647 (C2) HDA temperature 33 44 85899345953 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 109830903705323 (F1) Unknown 100 253 16563869293 (F2) Unknown 100 253 19257132704	75.6% Very good	Read 132 Write 131 Mixed 133 100% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.92 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.38 115% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 112%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB 766 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 119GB free, PID a83a Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	43.3% Average	Read 114 Write 99.4 Mixed 69.6 116% 94.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.66 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 1 98% 2.64 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 35%
Samsung Flash Drive DUO 64GB 839 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 60GB free, PID 1000 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Read 135 Write 85.3 Mixed 22.5 87% 80.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.99 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 1.19 114% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 35%
Adata DashDrive Elite S102 Pro USB 3.0 64GB-$13 599 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 33GB free, PID 312b Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Read 99.7 Write 8.47 Mixed 42.5 49% 50.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.35 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 1.14 112% 2.98 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905402-174.A00G 2x4GB 398 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	49.7% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 15.3 48% 17 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 14.8 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 69.9 57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61-M PRO Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M PRO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	30x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	29x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	20x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	33x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	10x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	15x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	7x
PSD34G133381 2x4GBPatriotBench 44%, 873 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $233

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16