Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 18 '20 at 18:45
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 158
2-Core 316
104% 190 Pts
4-Core 622
8-Core 603
82% 612 Pts
64-Core 618
38% 618 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 102%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
MSI(1462 3369) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2685 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 155
Parallax 135
115% 144 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 138
Splatting 115
101% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
456GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 329 592 87 83 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,500
Write 1,443
Mixed 1,086
SusWrite 266
240% 1,074 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 85.3
300% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 683
DQ Write 949
DQ Mixed 273
358% 635 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 205%
Great: 295%
Crucial M4 512GB-$74
111GB free
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 220 285 286 287 287 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 482
Write 274
Mixed 300
SusWrite 261
73% 329 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 28.8
127% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 52.1
57% 95.1 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 81%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$98
22GB free
Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 140 61 46 46 53 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 634
Write 312
Mixed 390
SusWrite 107
80% 361 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 52.7
207% 83.5 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 172
146% 207 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
42GB free
Firmware: 04.04V06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 92 90 93 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 92.4
Write 91.8
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 92.2
63% 85 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 68%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
18GB free
Firmware: 04.04V06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 113 112 111 106 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 111
Write 106
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 107
73% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 36.2
115% 40.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 45.8
SC Mixed 33.3
98% 34.5 GB/s
Latency 51.4
78% 51.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 113%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270E GAMING Builds (Compare 6,543 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $993
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback